FORSKIN RESTORATION

[Chemunch]

If your circumsized, do you want your forskin back?

[blu2]

eeeewwwwww

[Kujo]

Who wants a dick that looks like an anteater?

[OrngePlasticTree]

what a thing to waste your first post on.

[Lucent]

what a thing to waste your first post on.


BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! :twak:

[OrngePlasticTree]

well i mean damn.

[blu2]

I've never even seen one , and I sure as hell dont want to . gross.

[dr00]

ew... NO

[Jimmy Mac]

mmmm Burrito

[cosmobaby1]

Oh! You people get your damn foreskin back, but when I want my hymen back, ITS A BIG GOL' DAMN DEAL!!! WTF???!!!


I mean, JESUS! Its a man's fuckin' world, ain't it!

[cosmobaby1]

But, no, girls think thats gross when a guy still has all that shit. Did you see that episode of Nip/Tuck?? YEAH!

Who wants to fuck a Vienna Sausage??

[OrngePlasticTree]

hymen restoration is possible.

it looks like its wearin a beanie, lol

[xxplicitgrooves]

aint nothin wrong with a cock sock

[Alyce]

aint nothin wrong with a cock sock um, right on... what's da big deal with it anyway? Are there any girls out there who have a foreskin preference? Just curious...

[euphoric]

I WANT MY FORESKIN BACK BLARGBLARG

[Cire]

:confused: :barf: on foreskin...:banana:

[BGirl]

Where, exactly, do they get the new foreskin from..... :confused:

[hellewell]

fondu pot of course

[BGirl]

:barf:

[Annie]

Gross

[kitty30132]

well....never bothered me..i mean its natural isnt it...what can u do bitch that he has his for skin..doenst bother me ..i never felt any difference in bed

[Fallosophy]

definately not





















I LOVE the German Helmet

[tatilibra]

eewwww

[mcevade]

yeah they cut it off the top. and apprently there's a way to pull the skin back over the head which will actually uncircumsize your penis. (Saw it on Penn and Tellar's Bullshit) And from what an interviewer said on that episode, women like it more??

[Taishi]

from what they said on that episode, men like it better too

i actually considered it for a while, then I sobered up


i had it restored

























joking of course






























or am i

[mcevade]

well it's natural. that's the way it's suppose to be. And apprently helps you know when your climaxing more effectively. One of the reason's it's done today is because we are use to seeing it like that. But apprently the reason it was started is because of a certain religon who didn't want little boys playing with themselves.

[dr00]

well it's natural. that's the way it's suppose to be. And apprently helps you know when your climaxing more effectively. One of the reason's it's done today is because we are use to seeing it like that. But apprently the reason it was started is because of a certain religon who didn't want little boys playing with themselves.no it was thought to be unsanitary

if it was just "a certain religion" then only jews would still be doing it today :p

[~*Supa*~]

How many girls have actually been with guys that haven't been uncircumsized???

I dated a guy right out of high school named Bryan that was born in Germany so he wasn't circumsized, and honestly it wasn't much different in bed with him, then with any other guy that had been....

However.....getting a PA when you aren't circumsized it's a great idea.....

[~*Supa*~]

Well then, I stand corrected...

However you can never know the benefits if you are already circumsized, and it seems to be too painful to reverse...so yeah......

[kevinb70]

It is now known that the male foreskin, or prepuce, is the principal location of erogenous sensation in the human male (see Anatomy.) Removal of the prepuce substantially reduces erogenous sensation.11,15 Therefore (in the appropriate cultural context), circumcision is revealed as a sacrifice of "sinful" human enjoyment (in this earthly life), for the sake of holiness in the afterlife.11

So basically if everyone were circumsized, instead of the average act of intercourse being about 6 minutes for americans... the average time before the guy blows his load would be about 3 minutes? I think guys can live with that... women... I dunno if they would be too happy about that.... [intentionally avoiding mentioning my average times so as to not sound like corey]

[CoreyVonWaters]

So basically if everyone were circumsized, instead of the average act of intercourse being about 6 minutes for americans... the average time before the guy blows his load would be about 3 minutes? I think guys can live with that... women... I dunno if they would be too happy about that.... [intentionally avoiding mentioning my average times so as to not sound like corey]

Was that meant to be a snide comment towards me or were you just trying to be more objective??

[Chemunch]

some links.

http://www.cirp.org/pages/restore.html
http://www.infocirc.org/rest-e.htm
http://www.circumstitions.com/Restore.html
http://net.indra.com/~shredder/restore/

[Quique66]

Ultimately is a personal decision.

[kevinb70]

Was that meant to be a snide comment towards me or were you just trying to be more objective??
yes

[CoreyVonWaters]

Well which is it man??

[pinkpolkadot]

forskin would be yucky, i think.

[CoreyVonWaters]

Yep I wouldn't want that shit back on.

[KandyManRob]

definately not





















I LOVE the German Helmet




I always knew my penis was a nazi

[sunnie]

they just did a study that circumsized males have a less chance of catching HIV then uncircumsized males

http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20050925/circumcision_aids_050925/20050925?hub=Health

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8715260/

[Adam Sin]

i think it's nasty i would never want it back. The cleanliness issues of it are disturbing

[Cire]

i think it's nasty i would never want it back. The cleanliness issues of it are disturbing


i got to go with you. the fact that an overwhelming majority has voted to get it back. :barf: .

i want my pen-is to looks like a pen-is not a milk dud, stick it in :moon:


this make me laugh to even be commenting on this :hahaha:

[Cire]

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/52/Uncircumcised_penis.jpg

[Cire]

^:jerkit: :banghead: thats where you want to be when jesus comes back. *sheesh*

[Omnia est unum]

I Really would like to know what it would feel like, but since the nerve endings are gone, stretching it back out isnt going to let me find out.

[nanzer]

Well ladies, and gents, if it's no big deal to lose 60% of your genital covering, how about we remove the clitoral hood and half the inner labia from female infants at birth? cause that's the female equivalent of male circumcision. don't like the idea ladies, neither do we men who have actually taken the time to learn what was actually done to us. and no, getting cut does not prevent HIV. read the actual studies and you'll find that out. circumcision started as a religious practice to curb the sexual appetites of men in the case of Jews and for hygiene in Muslims.

Circumcision started as a medical practice in America in the 1800’s. it was used as a method for preventing young men from masturbating, raise your hand if it worked for you. Later, circumcision was thought to prevent every known sexually transmitted disease known to man. Then it was supposed to prevent penile cancer, urinary tract infections, and cervical cancer in women. Well, as it turns out, it doesn’t prevent any of these things either. The latest craze is HIV……. I’ll let you guess how this one is going to pan out. The most common myth is that circumcision is more sanitary than being intact. Also false. It is easier to care for a foreskin than it is to brush your teeth. Smega is actually filled with anti bacterial agents, not surprisingly, women also produce smegma.

As far as duration in sex, restored men say that while they are more sensitive in some ways, they are less sensitive in others. So no ladies, an intact man is not more likely to finish the race earlier than a circumcised man. Unless you’re talking about the race you’ve already finished and wish he would too. For the ladies who said they couldn’t tell a difference, it’s either because you were young and inexperienced or your boy toy was, or because you had hang ups with thinking an intact penis is ugly or dirty, neither is true. Women who have had sex with intact partners prefer intact sex as opposed to circumcised sex. Why? Because circumcision irreparably changes the physical dynamics of sexual intercourse. A circumcised penis causes more abrasion and reduces lubrication. Intact sex is by virtue, gentler and more natural.

But hey guy and gals, don’t take my word for it. Here are a couple of videos for you to watch. Both videos can be found on the following page:

http://video.yahoo.com/video/profile?yid=painfulquestioning (http://video.yahoo.com/video/profile?yid=painfulquestioning)


the 2 videos are: the functions of the prepuce (foreskin) and yes, especially for you people who think it’s no big deal, an actual video of a routine infant circumcision

fore the record, according to a study by the American academy of pediatrics published in 2000, 1 in 476 infant circumcisions was botched resulting in significant complications. Yeah fellas, that means various bits actually cut off, possible gender reassignment or even death.

If you actually take the time to watch these videos, you’ll never say some of the stupid sh!t that some of you posted, ever again.

non surgical restoration is fcking sweet…… and for the record, when I’m finished I’ll be “uncircumcised” as apposed to “intact” which is what a guy with his entire penis should be called.

[Cire]

^^^^^This motherfucker hacked the system :fuckyou:

[TrancyGirl]

this thread has just started an interesting conversation in my office-- neither of the two women i work with have ever seen foreskin on a man









:twitch:

[daddyjack]

dunno man i would add an extra cock and an extra sack and then get supa charged to fire all at once while black sabbath was played on 78 speed....

new poll time

[th3puppetmaster]

lol at this thread...

no, not at all, im am quite satasfied without it